|
Post by Tozzie on Apr 25, 2005 16:24:30 GMT -6
There is one GOOD reason to execute him as quick as possible, and that is him being held captive in a US prison leaves a chance for another terrorist event or hostage taking as a tool to get him released. Granted events like this will continue to occur against America, but holding an Islamic terrorist is NOT in the best interest of the US, but it is in the best interest of the rest of the world, as this would give the Muslim world another object to use against the US, while the rest of the world safer from the attacks of Muslim terrorists. As far as I am concerned there are 3000 good reasons to execute him ASAP. The Muslim extremeists will always find an excuse for their actions regardless if he is in prison or executed.
|
|
|
Post by Tozzie on Apr 22, 2005 6:30:50 GMT -6
Houston woman gets another date for execution The attorney for Frances Newton says he will try to exonerate her By DALE LEZON Copyright 2005 Houston Chronicle A Houston woman on death row who was temporarily spared by Gov. Rick Perry moments before her execution last year faces another execution date. ADVERTISEMENT State District Judge Jim Wallace on Thursday scheduled Frances Newton to die by injection Sept. 14, said David Dow, one of her attorneys and founder of the Texas Innocence Network. Newton was convicted of shooting to death her husband and their two young children in 1987. Prosecutors said she killed them to collect $100,000 in insurance money. Newton said she thinks they were killed by a drug dealer she knew only as Charlie to whom her husband owed money. Dow said he plans to attempt to exonerate Newton before she is executed. He said he hopes to test bloody carpet from the crime scene. "There are other things we can do, and we plan on doing them," he said. Dow said Newton, 40, remains confident she will be proven innocent. "She's obviously disappointed that a date has been set, but she is still hopeful that the truth will come out," he said. Hours before her scheduled execution Dec. 1, Perry granted Newton a 120-day reprieve to give her attorneys time to investigate questions about the evidence used to convict her. They wanted to retest ballistics evidence and a skirt she wore the night her family was killed. Retesting of bullets from the crime scene matched a gun prosecutors say was the murder weapon and which was linked to Newton. Wallace denied defense requests to test the skirt. Tests on the skirt before Newton's 1988 trial showed nitrates on her dress, which can be caused by exposure to gunfire. Newton has maintained that her dress was soiled with garden manure, which may have caused similar test results. New technology can distinguish between evidence of gunfire and garden manure, but prosecutors said the 1988 procedure was a "destructive test" that eliminated any chemical evidence, rendering additional tests inconclusive. Prosecutors have also said the skirt was stored with other evidence from the crime scene and contaminated by it. The 120-day reprieve expired at the end of March, and the Harris County District Attorney's Office requested a new execution date be set, Dow said. Another of Newton's attorneys, John LaGrappe, said he may file a federal appeal "alleging prosecutorial misconduct in the way that the dress was handled." Prosecutorial Misconduct? Give me a break, this lying POS swore up and down the gun that she acknowledged having and hiding was not the murder weapon yet it was tested again it is the murder wepon, so that ploy didn't work so now they are grasping at straws to save an aminal who killed her own children. This is just like Kevin Cooper in California, he won the right to have evidence retested and four different pieces of evidence, DNA evidence points directly to him so now his supporters are claiming the evidence is flawed. It is one thing to be an anti, but when the animal is guilty they are guilty, not only dont' they want these people executed they want they freed from prison. How pathetic.
|
|
|
Post by Tozzie on Apr 21, 2005 7:26:20 GMT -6
What age do pros think the cut off should be? Or should there not be one and we should execute them regardless of how old they are? I think 16 should be the cut off. In my state at 16 you are charged and prosecuted as an adult, not a juvenile offender as an adult and are subject to the same punishment as any other adult
|
|
|
Post by Tozzie on Apr 20, 2005 17:05:14 GMT -6
Why is everyone upset when the Judge followed the law? I can't believe you are even asking that question, that ruling from the Supreme Court is arguably one of the most horrendous I have ever seen. The people are upset because animals like the one in this case will be able to escape punishment the victims get no justice and that is a true Crime.
|
|
|
Post by Tozzie on Apr 22, 2005 22:50:29 GMT -6
What can be done to prevent this sort of thing from happening?
|
|
|
Post by Tozzie on Apr 27, 2005 18:10:54 GMT -6
That's Latin for "The Thing Speaks For Itself." If someone can find conclusive proof of her innocence, then the D.A. should have been able to find it. That spells frame-up. I'd advise against your using hate speech in postings. If she is found innocent after her execution, I'd gladly charge you as an accessory to capital murder. Your rants are ludicrous at best. The DA has evidence that is presented to a jury it is the defenses job to disprove that evidence and apparently they couldn't and she was convicted. I personally think she is guilty and should rot in H**L. and despite your delusions I am entitled to say that and there is no crime to charge me or anyone else with you need to get a grip on reality it would do you some good.
|
|
|
Post by Tozzie on Feb 20, 2005 13:43:51 GMT -6
I have just read "Dead Run: The Untold Story of Dennis Stockton and America's Only Mass escape from Death Row" by Burke and Jackson. Can anyone let me know if the 21 day rule in Virginia still exists or have they seen some sort of light? I am being straight down the line on this, I live in the UK where we have no DP and I have no real experience personally with the DP but I am unable to believe that the US still has a state which will not allow evidence over 21 days old unless it is DNA, most people would not have got over the shock in that situation let alone be able to get their act together to present evidence. I may not be reading your question correctly but the 21 day rule in VA is 21 days after a trial verdict not 21 days after the crime. I don't know if they have changed the law as of yet.
|
|
|
Post by Tozzie on Mar 8, 2005 22:45:21 GMT -6
Powell was unarmed when he entered the store. He killed Ms. Gladden because she resisted and he was wasted. The tire iron was behind the counter. Yeah, he got carried away. Like Rick James said "Cocaine's a powerful drug!" Had he committed this crime today, the dp wouldn't even be on the table. He killed the victim because he is an animal. High on drugs is not an excuse nor reason. He got the sentence he deserved.
|
|
|
Post by Tozzie on Jan 9, 2005 19:30:12 GMT -6
Getting it wrong in Texas'It was just a fire."That's what a renowned arson investigator said of a 1991 fire that claimed the lives of three little girls. He said it may well have been an accident. Unfortunately, Texas' justice system was too blind to consider that investigator's analysis as it condemned Cameron Todd Willingham to death for setting the fire that killed his 3 children. The result: Texas last year may well have executed an innocent man. As Tribune reporters Steve Mills and Maurice Possley detailed in an astonishing report last month, the case against Willingham was built atop one hollow brick after another. Many of the claims made at trial by fire investigators were based on theories that since have been repudiated by scientific advances. Four fire experts who reviewed the case at the request of the Tribune found the investigation to be seriously flawed. They said it was possible the fire was merely an accident. The Texas deputy state fire marshal who investigated the case testified at Willingham's trial that the melted aluminum threshold was evidence that an accelerant had been used to set the fire. He was wrong. A fire that started without accelerant, new research shows, could have burned hot enough to melt the threshold. The fact that traces of charcoal lighter fluid were found under the front threshold, the fire marshal testified, also provided evidence accelerant was used to light the fire. Wrong again. Firefighters' hoses may well have propelled the plastic container of lighter fluid that had been on the porch under the threshold. He claimed that "brown rings" found on the concrete front porch also pointed to use of an accelerant. Wrong. Such rings can be left when puddles of fire-hose water evaporate. Burn marks found under carpet tiles and the crackly "crazed" glass also provided proof that an accelerant was used, according to the fire marshal's testimony. Wrong. In fact, this fire marshal apparently had never met a fire he didn't think was arson. At least that's what he said during Willingham's trial. He stated that during his career, nearly every fire he ever investigated was arson--a statement fire experts who reviewed this case for the Tribune found astonishing and incredulous. Prosecutors offered up an unreliable jailhouse snitch on psychiatric medication who claimed Willingham confessed to him. They also based their case on the suggestion that Willingham didn't appear to be aggressive enough about getting his children out of the 1991 fire and that he didn't appear as grief-stricken afterward as he should have been. They offered a questionable motive: He wanted more time for drinking beer and throwing darts. Texas Gov. Rick Perry and Texas judges had access to the report by the prominent scientist, Gerald Hurst, that sharply questioned whether this fire was set by an arsonist. They set the report aside. Willingham was executed last February. That's what passes for justice in Texas. The Willingham case undermines the notion that we execute only those we know to be guilty "beyond a reasonable doubt." It should send a shiver across the nation. (source: Editorial, Chicago Tribune) So these "experts" read a few reports and determined that the investigator at the scene who actually looked at the scene was wrong. You can put two "experts" on a witness stand one for the defense and one for the prosecution and you will get two totally different answers from the "experts" yes I think we should rush to get rid of the death penalty because of an article written by unbiased reporters proved a innocent man was executed @@@@. Get real show me some real evidence not a newspaper article
|
|
|
Post by Tozzie on Jan 6, 2005 22:27:10 GMT -6
Joy-Thank for being the voice of reason on this thread. Guest and Loretta: I really don't think they will even attempt to get the death penalty. It would be a waste to do for all involved. She killed her children instead of herself because she thought she had already made tehm dirty with sin and was setting them up to be non-religious and sinful. She thought that if she killed them they would be spared in heaven. If she killed herself her children would not have been saved. She was not thinking of the earth bond law but was completly immersed in the Bible not to mention her husband and some freaky cult preacher. Its called altruistic killing. No the waste was 5 innocent little lives taken by this creature, by the person they trusted the most, the person they always thought would protect them. The oldest was 7 and he died knowing his mother killed him, I was watching my 4 year old nephew and 3 year old niece yesterday and watching how innocent they are and how trusting of the people they know, the people they run to for help with something, there is one thing that I can say, there is no valid excuse for hurting let alone murdering a child and anyone who does deserves the death penalty. Nope no sympathy for her, just prayers for her poor children who died at her hands.
|
|
|
Post by Tozzie on Dec 16, 2004 6:47:11 GMT -6
First you deny that mentally ill convicts are executed. Facing facts, suddenly that doesn't matter because you don't care anyway. That you don't care is at least more honest and a valid argument from your point of view. However a lot of people do care. So do a lot of legal clauses and human rights conventions and agreements signed and ratified by the US. First of all Mental illness and competency are two different things, second of all I dont' care if they claim to be mentally ill. An no I won't trust you just because you say they were mentally ill. This is my thought if anyone live in society free to come and go as they please they they have to be held accountable under the law, otherwise put them in institutions. Can't have it both ways.
|
|
|
Post by Tozzie on Dec 15, 2004 16:48:58 GMT -6
You can find several cases of mentally ill people executed, and many mentally ill sentenced to death... I don't need to find them as I don't care, mental illness is not a viable defense in my book.
|
|
|
Post by Tozzie on Dec 14, 2004 23:15:40 GMT -6
There are many examples of people who have deliberately asked for dp, dropped appeals and volunteered for execution, like state sanctioned suicide. Two well known examples are Aileen Wuornos and Carl Panzram. Both suffering from severe mental illness of course... Are you telepathic? You are able to diagnose a severe mental illness? In every case that I have ever read about where appeals were dropped, a competency hearing is held and the inmate is examined by psychiatrist. Apparently they weren't mentaly ill or incompetent or they wouldn't have been executed. I have a wild idea maybe, just maybe, they decided to take responsibility for their crimes and accept the punishment for them.
|
|
|
Post by Tozzie on Dec 8, 2004 23:54:08 GMT -6
Not sure of which death row you are refering too, but the one I know of (Texas) there are no TV's, no church services, no schooling. When and "IF" they get rec it is one hour by themselves. Total isolation. Oh, and if you are on level I, you get a radio. Level II and III, no radio..nothing. on Level III, no commisary either and if you run out of soap, toothpaste etc... too bad, you are not allowed that either. You need to get your facts straight before you make assumptions like this They are still breathing, eating, sleeping. They are a lot better off than their victims hopefully not for too much longer but it is longer than their victims had. I don't see a problem and if they are on level 3 they did something to get there. I really have no sympathy.
|
|
|
Post by Tozzie on Dec 3, 2004 18:41:21 GMT -6
You are right, the pain of loosing someone never goes away. It never goes away but at least the victims family will have closure. A very good friend of mine was murdered 10 years ago and knowing the three animals that killed him are stealing oxygen from the rest of us angers me to no end. They are not the ones who should be eating, sleeping and breathing.
|
|
|
Post by Tozzie on Jun 8, 2005 21:59:38 GMT -6
I have had many close Catholic friends throughout my life, I had Catholic roommates every year that I was at the Naval Academy, shared a house with Catholics, my oldest daughter just graduated from a Cathholic college and both of my daughters are dating Catholics. But there is a Catholic priest in Indiand who has tried very hard to turn me against the Catholic faith. He asserted that it was an "atrocity" to mercifully execute this soul torturer. Is this hate criminal's pleasant death was an "atrocity", what word would this priest use to describe the deaths of his victims. I am stunned sometimes by the egregous dishonesty of some Catholic priests. They have to divert attention from their own scandals. I am Roman Catholic, raised and went through 12 years of catholic school and I don't agree with a lot of their positions on things they shoudl mind their own backyard before going into others.
|
|
|
Post by Tozzie on Nov 22, 2004 18:31:27 GMT -6
This question is not whether or not you believe in the dp, but whether you think Scott will get the dp or life. This is a tough one, although I think he deserves the death penalty I am thinking that he will get life. Which in California is basically the same thing.
|
|
|
Post by Tozzie on Nov 29, 2004 19:05:33 GMT -6
This is just another racialy motivaded execution. Blacks has been depressed by the US since the 1800s and today is no differant. Us brothas and sistas need to stop the racism in this country. THe whites have all the power to keep us down. Why does we have to suffer still? When all else fails pull the race card right? Wrong you lose this argument as there are many more Caucasians on death row as compared to minorities. Caucasions are executed more than minorites as well. You might want to get facts to back up your statements instead of kneejerk comments that only what to flame.
|
|
|
Post by Tozzie on Feb 14, 2005 22:33:44 GMT -6
i started reading reports and a book about Mumia Abu-Jamal and he really seems to be America´s Nelson Mandela, a prisoner for political reasons. Of course you think he is innocent, then again you befriend cop killers. Try reading the actual court transcripts from the tiral and the testimony not some website that idolizes this animal.
|
|
|
Post by Tozzie on Nov 24, 2004 21:35:52 GMT -6
The prosecution claimed that the shot which killed Faulkner came from Mumia Abu-Jamal’s legally registered .38-caliber weapon, contradicting the medical examiner’s report that the bullet removed from Faulkner’s brain was a .44-caliber. This fact was kept from the jury. Moreover, a ballistics expert found it incredible that police at the scene failed to test Mumia’s gun to see if has been recently fired, or to test his hands for powder residue. One of the most *darn*ing prosecution claims was that Mumia confessed at the hospital. However, this confession was not reported until nearly two months after December 9th, immediately after Mumia had filed a brutality suit against the police. One of the officers who claims to have heard the confession is Gary Wakshul. However, in his police report on that day he stated, “the Negro male made no comments.” Dr. Coletta, the attending physician who was with Mumia the entire time, says that he never heard Mumia speak.
It just amazes me that you all ignore facts. READ.... His gun is a 38, the bullet take out of the officers head was a .44. Mumia was shot, beated and at the hospital did not say anything, yet 2 months later the police say he confessed? Yet the report of that night says he "made no comments", the Dr who was with him the entire time says he never heard Mumia speak. So what if a cab driver saw him. Look at the other hard facts. If there is any doubt, then his sentence needs to be overturned, or a new trial. We are not the one's ignoring facts you ignoring the facts. This animal killed Officer Faulkner and he should have been executed a long time ago. I don't get facts from anti websites sorry too biased.
|
|
|
Post by Tozzie on Nov 18, 2004 18:11:39 GMT -6
. Maybe Mumia thought it was a mugger, or an angry person, who knows? If this story is plausible, the senteence should be involuntary manslaughter with a sentence of 5-10 yrs. It is kind of hard if not damned impossible to mistake a Police officer in full uniform for a Mugger, please, your post is extremely insulting regardless if you have been to Philly or not. TEXT
|
|
|
Post by Tozzie on Nov 6, 2004 14:47:19 GMT -6
After many years of monitoring Mumia Abu-Jamal's case and a thorough study of original documents, including the entire trial transcript, the organization has concluded that the proceedings used to convict and sentence Mumia Abu-Jamal to death were in violation of minimum international standards that govern fair trial procedures and the use of the death penalty. Amnesty Intenation is hardly an unbiased organization, they don't support the death penalty for anyone. I am an adult who can make up my own mind based on the facts of the case, I too have read the court transcripts and I have come to the conclusion this animal is guilty and should have been executed a long time ago.
|
|
|
Post by Tozzie on Nov 4, 2004 21:47:14 GMT -6
Mumia Abu-Jamal is a renowned journalist from Philadelphia who has been in prison since 1981 and on death row since 1983 for allegedly shooting Philadelphia police officer Daniel Faulkner. He is known as the “Voice of the Voiceless” for his award- winning reporting on police brutality and other social and racial epidemics that plague communities of color in Philadelphia and throughout the world. Mumia has received international support over the years in his efforts to overturn his unjust conviction. Mumia Abu-Jamal was serving as the President of the Association of Black Journalists at the time of his arrest. He was a founding member of the Philadelphia Chapter of the Black Panther Party as a teenager. Years later he began reporting professionally on radio stations such as NPR, and was the news director of Philadelphia station WHAT. Much of his journalism called attention to the blatant injustice and brutality he watched happen on a daily basis to MOVE, a revolutionary organization that works to protect all forms of life--human, animal, plant--and the Earth as a whole. In 1981, Mumia worked as a cab driver at night to supplement his income. On December 9th he was driving his cab through the red light district of downtown Philadelphia at around 4 a.m. Mumia testifies that he let off a fare and parked near the corner of 13th and Locust Streets. Upon hearing gunshots, he turned and saw his brother, William Cook, staggering in the street. Mumia exited the cab and ran to the scene, where he was shot by a uniformed police officer and fell to the ground, fading in and out of consciousness. Within minutes, police arrived on the scene to find Officer Faulkner and Mumia shot; Faulkner died. Mumia was arrested, savagely beaten, thrown into a paddy wagon and driven to a hospital a few blocks away (suspiciously, it took over 30 minutes to arrive at the hospital). Mumia somehow survived. The trial began in 1982 with Judge Sabo (who sent more people to death row than any other judge) presiding. Mumia wished to represent himself and have John Africa as his legal advisor, but before jury selection had finished, this right was revoked and an attorney was forcibly appointed for him. Throughout the trial, Mumia was accused of disrupting court proceedings and was not allowed to attend most of his own trial. Sabo lived up to his nickname of “Prosecutor in Robes.”<br> The prosecution claimed that the shot which killed Faulkner came from Mumia Abu-Jamal’s legally registered .38-caliber weapon, contradicting the medical examiner’s report that the bullet removed from Faulkner’s brain was a .44-caliber. This fact was kept from the jury. Moreover, a ballistics expert found it incredible that police at the scene failed to test Mumia’s gun to see if has been recently fired, or to test his hands for powder residue. One of the most *darn*ing prosecution claims was that Mumia confessed at the hospital. However, this confession was not reported until nearly two months after December 9th, immediately after Mumia had filed a brutality suit against the police. One of the officers who claims to have heard the confession is Gary Wakshul. However, in his police report on that day he stated, “the Negro male made no comments.” Dr. Coletta, the attending physician who was with Mumia the entire time, says that he never heard Mumia speak. The star prosecution witness, a prostitute named Cynthia White, was someone no other witness reported seeing at the scene. During the trial of Billy Cook (Mumia’s brother) just weeks before Mumia’s trial, White gave testimony completely contradictory to what she stated at Mumia’s trial. Her testimony at Billy Cook’s trial placed someone at the scene who was not there when police arrived. This corroborates the other five witness accounts that someone fled the scene. In a 1997 hearing, another former prostitute, Pamela Jenkins, testified that White was acting as a police informant. Other sworn testimony revealed that witness coercion was routinely practiced by the police. In 1995, eyewitness William Singletary testified that police repeatedly tore up his initial statement--that the shooter fled the scene--until he finally signed something acceptable to them. The following year, witness Veronica Jones came forward to testify that she had been coerced into changing her initial statement that two men fled the scene. Witness Billy Cook, who was present the whole time, has stated very clearly that Mumia is absolutely innocent. Due to police manipulation of witnesses, fabrication of evidence, and the rights of the defense severely denied, Mumia was found guilty. He was sentenced to death during the penalty phase based solely on his political beliefs. Mumia has been unjustly separated from his family for twenty-two years, with the threat of death looming over his head. This animal is a poster child for the death penalty, first your "facts" as stated in the above post are a little twisted, second he didn't Allegedly kill Police Officer Daniel Faulkner, he has been tried and convicted, lastly in all the years since his conviction and numerous appeals he has only managed to avoid the death chamber, no court has ever overturned the conviction.
There is a website, while not impartial to the slain officer has all the official court transcripts not an opinion of them, IMO once people read the trial transcripts they will realize that this animal is guilty as sin and should have been executed a long time ago. www.danielfaulkner.com/
|
|
|
Post by Tozzie on Nov 17, 2004 20:47:37 GMT -6
It is my opinion because I have taken the time to get to know some of them. Also, keep an eye on the newspapers, this is not going to go away. The families are upset over many things that are happening there and it will come out in the paper. You can also call TDCJ and ask......... The guard was in the wrong to gas Deon when they found him hanged in his cell. You are amazing, the inmates on death row, which you claim you have gotten to know, had a trial and were convicted and sentenced bya jury of their peers, the correctional officers have yet to be charged with anything and you have them convicted already with only the word of a death row inmate, you are pathetic. Watch the papers for what their slated views, the news media will print anything to sell their papers, they flash a headline and if they are wrong they print a retraction in small lettering on page 80. I sure will watch the papers and believe every word they write, I am amazed you are so gulible it is sad.
|
|
|
Post by Tozzie on Nov 14, 2004 20:44:47 GMT -6
1. It was not "Elkie" Taylor that wrote this. Go back and read again. 2. No matter who Deon was or what he did, the guards should be held accountable at a higher level of action because they are "supposed" to be better than the inmates on death row. So, tell me, is the action of gassing this guy when he has hung himself actions that would be deemed higher standards than the inmate? Shouldn't the reactions of the guards first to be to roll back the door and try to save him? 3. As to if his story is true.... all you have to do is call TDCJ and find out the facts. Sorry people, not all on death row are scum bags, liars, etc. I need more proof that something occured other than the letter of an inmate on death row, secondly it is your opinion that they are not all scumbags, they commited capital murder so in my book that makes them lower than life sorry I will never have pity for an inamte on death row, nor will I take their word as the truth unless a more reliable source backs it up.
|
|
|
Post by Tozzie on Oct 28, 2004 19:17:15 GMT -6
Well, in fact this questions bores me, but you are right. It violates the victim relatives rights to execute this man. Yes, since you are all intelligent and well-educated, some will tell me that there is no law which gives the victims family any right to intervene. Right, but what about this babbling about the healing of the victims families and blablabla .....? Oh, pro-db, i forgot about that. No moral, just guns. TEXTNo you see there is an obligation to protect the law abiding members of society from people such as Green who are nothing but pure evil. No, LWOP is not the answer, because there is a chance they will get out either by a change in law or by escape and they will murder again. In Texas there are 6 of these pure evil subjects on death row now, they earned thier trip there by escaping from prison in December of 2000, then on Christmas Eve they were commiting a robbery and a young Police Officer answered the alarm these evil creatures (sorry they are not human in my book) murdered him, left a 7 year old boy to remember Christmas Eve as the day his daddy died for the rest of his life. These creatures were known as the Texas 7, one was a coward and rather than be sent back to prison committed suicide when they were tracked down. This is one of many examples as to why murderers need to be executed not left in prisoners to either murder in prison or escape and murder law abiding citizens .
|
|
|
Post by Tozzie on Feb 1, 2005 23:28:54 GMT -6
loretta you are vicious girl. you have strong opinions. i joined a yahoo group for supporting women on d/r and i have met christa's mother through this group. and once you get to know her you see she is a great person she did nothing wrong in raising her daughter unfortunalty though she was raised good she went bad i went o middle school with crista and though i knew her for a short time only it was hard for me to understand how she committed this crime there are not explinations and we waste our time looking for them. though you have to understabd when you are locked up 23 hours out of the dy and treated like your trash you are going to be nasty. christa also suffers from bipoler and just recently was allowed to start taking her meds again. they with held them from her which is wrong. you ask me where i get my fact from? her own mother. who else Some of you anti's are funny, it is strange that you are posting that her mother is a great person because on a thread on the other board an anit posted an excuse for her behavior that she was an unwanted child who was abused by both parents. Captial Punishment is not revenge it is punishment and Christa has proven by her behavior that if not executed she will try to kill again and again. She is a rabid animal that needs to be put down.
|
|
|
Post by Tozzie on Oct 31, 2004 20:51:03 GMT -6
Ehm, just so you know: Christa is not allowed anything in prison. No tv, no cd's no nothing, she's not even allowed to phone anyone at this time. Just so you know she's not having a good time in there. I do agree by the way the state should let Colleens family let her put to rest. There is no need to keep Colleens skull from them for this case, all of the details that could ever be needed are written down and I do not understand why the state is doing this.
|
|
|
Post by Tozzie on Sept 12, 2007 21:37:36 GMT -6
Martha Vega was 50 years old and hard-working, was found dead in her Ridgewood, Queens basement apartment. And that the medical examiner confirmed Tuesday afternoon that Vega was killed, her skull was crushed by a horrible blow to the head, and she was strangled. wcbstv.com/local/local_story_254183810.html
|
|
|
Post by Tozzie on Sept 10, 2007 21:13:53 GMT -6
NORTH BAY SHORE, N.Y. A pregnant woman stabbed another pregnant woman to death after a brawl at the homeless shelter where they were living, police said. Shantelle Scruggs, 21, was arraigned Saturday on manslaughter charges in the killing of Barbara Santos, 26. Both women were eight months pregnant and lived at the Project ReDirect homeless shelter with about 20 other people. wcbstv.com/local/local_story_251170529.html
|
|