|
Post by flyhawk on Mar 1, 2005 23:00:18 GMT -6
Who killed those innocent boys who didn't have a chance at life?
|
|
|
Post by snowy111 on Mar 1, 2005 23:02:09 GMT -6
Who killed those innocent boys who didn't have a chance at life? Why didn't you add her husband to the list?
|
|
|
Post by bryan on Mar 1, 2005 23:10:21 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by flyhawk on Mar 1, 2005 23:25:37 GMT -6
Why didn't you add her husband to the list? I did now, I started a new one with him added on.
|
|
|
Post by Felix2 on Mar 2, 2005 4:22:18 GMT -6
any evidence to warrant adding the husband?
|
|
|
Post by Joy on Mar 2, 2005 13:05:38 GMT -6
There is still one things that bothers me about this case. Her wounds..... could someone do these types of wounds to themselves? I find it hard that if she did do it, she was alone.
|
|
|
Post by flyhawk on Mar 2, 2005 14:30:15 GMT -6
There is still one things that bothers me about this case. Her wounds..... could someone do these types of wounds to themselves? I find it hard that if she did do it, she was alone. Yea, it would be hard to that to yourself, If she did she has to messed up one way or another.
|
|
|
Post by robzerr on Mar 4, 2005 23:21:13 GMT -6
I tell you what. There aren't enough of these murdering mammas getting the death penalty.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 5, 2005 21:23:41 GMT -6
There are so many things about this case that I dont understand. I know that she is now awaiting the judges answer to whether or not he will allow the dna testing of some of the untested crime scene evidence such as a pubic hair and a limb hair.blood and other stuff. Ill be interested in seeing that.
|
|
|
Post by Jen on Mar 14, 2005 20:04:53 GMT -6
This case is so disturbing. How would she get all those bruises to her arm? Did her husband catch her doing this? If so why would he protect her for so long. Were they in it together? So many unanswered questions.... Anyone have any thoughts??
|
|
|
Post by Jen on Mar 14, 2005 20:06:24 GMT -6
I stand corrected...bruises to her armS.
|
|
|
Post by Jane on Mar 15, 2005 7:08:59 GMT -6
the slash to her neck was aparantely self inflicted. they base this on the actual slash - if someone slashes a throat it is generally a clean cut from left to right - they indicate the slash was done in a slanting angle meaning she held the knife in her right hand and cut her throat from left to right.... i dont know they are so many things which dont add up in this case it will be interesting indeed to find out the nitty gritty
|
|
|
Post by Felix2 on Mar 15, 2005 9:19:24 GMT -6
Just typical jane, now you're trying to blame and drag poor old nitty gritty into this. I'm sure he is innocent.
|
|
|
Post by Jane on Mar 15, 2005 9:32:51 GMT -6
we shall see
|
|
|
Post by Joy on Mar 15, 2005 9:48:20 GMT -6
I still am not convinced that she did it..... however I am convinced that there was more than one person involved in this. As to who.... I don't know, but if she did do this, she wasn't alone.
|
|
|
Post by Jen on Mar 15, 2005 16:38:35 GMT -6
Jane,
Thanks for the response. I think I need to brush up on the details to this case. I read one of the books published about this case. However, after that I got on the Darlie Routier website just briefly and I just don't get it. How could anyone do this. I have two boys and I just cannot conceive how a mother could do this. Do you think the father had anything to do with this?
Joy, what leads you to think she did not do it? My question sounds so harsh however it's not intended that way. What do you think?? Jen
|
|
|
Post by susan on Mar 17, 2005 19:27:47 GMT -6
I still would like to hear more about her husband.
You all who know the trial and what has happened after that, please tell me. Even I'm totally pro DP person I still don't wish that anyone innocent is executed. I wish this system would be more "rightful".
Tell me all you know please. Thanks.
|
|
|
Post by Rev. Agave on Mar 17, 2005 19:32:07 GMT -6
all i know is the lady who wrote a book about her espousing her guilt has now changed her mind and thinks she is innocent. Funny you could write a whole book about a case and then change your mind.
|
|
|
Post by Jen on Mar 18, 2005 7:24:32 GMT -6
I still would like to hear more about her husband. You all who know the trial and what has happened after that, please tell me. Even I'm totally pro DP person I still don't wish that anyone innocent is executed. I wish this system would be more "rightful". Tell me all you know please. Thanks. www.fordarlieroutier.org This website has the court transcripts on it.
|
|
|
Post by Jane on Mar 18, 2005 7:36:22 GMT -6
i reallyhave a bad gut feeling on this... i feel she is guilty as hell i might be proved wrong... but gut feelings are always right ya know
|
|
|
Post by Jen on Mar 18, 2005 14:07:45 GMT -6
I have brushed up on the details. I think she is guilty in one form or another...meaning either she did it herself or had it set up....
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2005 14:14:27 GMT -6
I have brushed up on the details. I think she is guilty in one form or another...meaning either she did it herself or had it set up.... I agree. I think the husband knows more than he is saying also. she said she was sleeping downstairs because her new baby would wake her up tossing in the middle of the night - then she wants you to believe she slept through the attack on her boys when they were only feet from her? There are so many things that don't add up that points to her guilt.
|
|
|
Post by Jen on Mar 18, 2005 15:15:57 GMT -6
I agree. I think the husband knows more than he is saying also. she said she was sleeping downstairs because her new baby would wake her up tossing in the middle of the night - then she wants you to believe she slept through the attack on her boys when they were only feet from her? There are so many things that don't add up that points to her guilt. Exactly. This case makes me sick...I cannot fathom "sleeping" through this whole ordeal. I mean my son calls out my name in the middle of the night from across the hall and I mean to tell you I am up and running. I think one of the things I read that I found so upsetting is that when she was on the phone (911)and the officer arrived he kept telling her to help in getting some towels and apply pressure with them to her children's wounds and she would not listen...was more concerned with her own cut to her throat. I mean according to the documents he asked her several times. Also this thing about the knife and telling the 911 operator "I already touched it...oh know maybe we could have gotten prints off of it" ( I don't know...the whole thing just stinks!!
|
|
|
Post by susan on Mar 19, 2005 2:12:55 GMT -6
Thank you very much. Interesting site. I just think her husband knows more that he is saying... One interesting detail, I saw a document of her case (that's how I got interested), it was on German tv and can't remember the name, but there was said that someone was vacuuming at the same time when she made the 911 call. Any of you heard of this? I was just thinking who was cleaning if there was only 2 adults in the house... I think it's absurd to vacuum if your kids lie dead and your wife is half dead also... well they had "visitors" coming
|
|
|
Post by Jen on Mar 19, 2005 10:27:35 GMT -6
Susan,
They said someone was vacuming?? Weird. I only heard that the vacum cleaner was turned over and that it looked staged....
This woman does not appear to have had all her dogs barking...and to boot seems to me she was extremely narcissistic!! I know that does not make someone guilty of a crime...however based on most of the evidence I think she did it or was somehow involved...
|
|
|
Post by britfeld on Mar 20, 2005 20:54:16 GMT -6
My gut feeling with this is Darlie is innocent and this is a terrible miscarriage of justice. Even worse, if or when she goes to the gurney.
|
|
|
Post by Jen on Mar 20, 2005 21:02:18 GMT -6
My gut feeling with this is Darlie is innocent and this is a terrible miscarriage of justice. Even worse, if or when she goes to the gurney. Welcome Britfeld, I have not heard to many people say that....what leads you to believe this?
|
|
|
Post by britfeld on Mar 20, 2005 21:11:09 GMT -6
Wasn't there talk of a possible insurance fraud at some stage which suggested her husband arranged for the house to be burgled etc. Maybe Darlie was not a party to this and was simply in the wrong place at the wrong time. If she really wanted her children out of the way because they were cramping her style how come the youngest was unharmed? I would guess that Darin had a major role in this and there is a whole side to this saga that has never come out, and perhaps never will.
|
|
|
Post by Jen on Mar 20, 2005 21:20:12 GMT -6
You know you make a good argument....I have often thought about that...and yes there was talk about an insurance fraud. I think she is guilty in one form or another...whether she actually did it...or just new about it i don't know.
If what you said was actually the truth then he would be about as low as low can get!
|
|
|
Post by britfeld on Mar 20, 2005 21:35:13 GMT -6
If she did know about an insurance fraud, on its own does this really warrant her recieving the death penalty, if she really did not murder her children? Also if she knew about the insurance fraud why is she keeping quiet to protect Darin? I believe it is likely she knew nothing and to her it was a genuine case of her being in the way on an intruder or intruders and more investigating should have been done in the beginning. Also is there not a question mark over a fingerprint which does not belong to any member of the Routier household. I do have nagging doubts about this one and feel that it is likely that the Police were in a rush to bring this case to a conclusion and neglected to investigate every possible avenue before they made an arrest. Unfortunately when a case gets to court, if the evidence is wrong, then the verdict will be wrong.
|
|