|
Post by oslooskar on Mar 24, 2007 15:05:31 GMT -6
What turns you on about the electric chair? Do you like the sparks, the burnt flesh, the odor etc? He's pitiful really, obviously gets some sort of kick out of it but not as often as he's like. I'd pay someone to take that ignorant bastard out Felix, you’re a hypocrite!
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Mar 8, 2007 23:49:01 GMT -6
This guy was a dangerous criminal linked to 15 deaths. If he got LWOP, he would still be running his gang, which is based in prison anyways. It's appropriate to say that the world is safer with this particular execution, no matter who the victims were. No doubt!
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Mar 7, 2007 1:26:11 GMT -6
I must confess that I find myself somewhat indifferent to the execution of a mobster who’s only known capital crime was knocking off other mobsters.
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Feb 20, 2007 2:13:06 GMT -6
His existence offends me.
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Feb 19, 2007 14:18:58 GMT -6
Reminds me of that 1995 thriller “Just Cause” with Ed Harris, Sean Connery and Blair Underwood.
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Feb 7, 2007 2:55:24 GMT -6
Richey has certainly received procedural due process. That's all that matters, Red. Gee whiz, I wonder why Joseph is starting to remind me of James Cagney as Sean Lenihan in “Shake Hands with the Devil”?
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Jan 28, 2007 19:08:23 GMT -6
Eh, mug shots aren't designed to flatter. Jacquiline looks better than most women look in their drivers license pics (which is a decent comparison as far as lighting and etc. goes). I saw a non-mugshot pic of her on a penpal site once and she was rather pretty. It's down now though. If I didn’t know anything about Tiffany and just saw her photo I would peg her as a wealthy, well educated, spoiled brat who probably had above average intelligence.
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Jan 28, 2007 14:38:48 GMT -6
Tiffany's cute; Alexa's kinda scary looking They’re both cute but I thought it was Tiffany who was the scary looking one. Jacquiline Reynolds (FL) is very pretty You’re kidding, right? Reynolds looks like a freaking drag queen.
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Jan 28, 2007 0:58:53 GMT -6
I just checked out Chelsea Richardson’s photo and I must say with a face like hers she might have made a good poker player. Holberg, on the other hand, looks very much like the psychopath that she is.
As for good looking female killers, there are a couple of women doing life in Florida who aren’t bad looking; TIFFANY PARSONSON and ALEXA BENNETT.
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Jan 25, 2007 18:44:15 GMT -6
You have a point there, oslo oskar, however the case here doesn’t back up your suspicion, as this child abuser/murderer was sentenced to death. Too bad for Tsutomu Miyazaki that he wasn’t smart enough to have dined on foreign cuisine like fellow Japanese cannibal Issey Sagawa. Perhaps if he’d eaten a nice Dutch girl he could have returned home after dinner and become an instant celebrity just like his fellow countryman did.
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Jan 23, 2007 15:03:47 GMT -6
while I regret and detest what the Japanese did in China, I think this posting goes a little too far. In lieu of the fact that the Japanese have never accepted responsibility for their crimes against humanity, nor made even the slightest attempt to compensate their victims, I would have to thoroughly disagree. See, I'm German national but I don't think that German judges would have spared Saddam punishment because Germans have "more understanding and tolerance" when it comes to poison gas or pogroms. I agree, but then the Germans, unlike the Japanese, have acknowledged their guilt and accepted full responsibility for their crimes against humanity and paid billions of dollars to the victims of National Socialism. I think there are many Japanese who feel the same detest for these war crimes and war criminals like we do I think you need to educate yourself.
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Jan 21, 2007 21:08:57 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Jan 15, 2007 22:20:14 GMT -6
Why hasn't this monster been executed yet!? I don’t know, I can only tell you that in late 1937 there were thousands of Japanese who took sadistic delight in the rape, murder and mutilation of small children in Nanking China. Therefore, it might simply be that the Japanese are more understanding and tolerant of behavior such as Mr. Miyazaki’s en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanking_Massacre
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Jan 19, 2007 0:16:06 GMT -6
Just wondering, would you oppose the execution of Osama Bin Laden beacuse it would turn him into a matyr for jihadists as well? No, I would only oppose his execution if he did not have a fair trial. (Show trials don’t count.) If we helped get rid of this dictator for good then I'm glad. It was the least America could do considering the fact that it helped install the no good S.O.B. A person can only be punished for murder where the crime took place in. I rather doubt that as I know of a case where a murderer is doing life in prison in North Carolina for killing two police officers in California. If i was president Bush right now i'd be looking underneath every vehicle i travelled in. So would I but not for the same reason. what is even crueller though is those bringing him to "justice" supported him when he did this to the Iranians, and now they want to be seen as judicial? Machiavelli could not have been more cunning. He got what was coming to him from his own people. I’m sure he did but I rather doubt he got a fair trial
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Jan 3, 2007 14:14:12 GMT -6
Why, so we could have a Pinochet II trial, wherein the defendant dies in custody of old age before the court can act? No, because it would have been politically expedient. After all, politics is not carried on for the sake of revenge; its sole purpose is the increase of power. He got what was coming to him from his own people. Whether true or not the fact remains that a very significant portion of the earth’s population isn’t buying that.
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Jan 3, 2007 7:07:04 GMT -6
Oh yeah, then he would have expected REAL punishment! Compared to his cell in Iraq, after which he didn't look too bad considering what he looked like coming out of the hole in the ground, he would have a nice five star cell. Three nice meals a day. Pampered by the left wing media, and by the courts who would go out of their way to make sure he is comfortable. No wonder his lawyers tried everything to get him sent to The Hague. Glennf, I’m afraid you’re too wrapped up with getting even to see the larger picture.
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Jan 3, 2007 5:52:01 GMT -6
I am of the opinion that it would have been better for all concerned had Saddam Hussein been turned over to the International Court of Justice in The Hague.
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Dec 27, 2006 0:40:17 GMT -6
On the other hand, how many Iraqi's own TVs? There are about 1,750,000 television sets in Iraq.
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Dec 26, 2006 0:46:42 GMT -6
When you say "they", who are you talking about? "They" chose to execute him, but lawyers and activist judges have been delaying it all these years. I’m a pro, in most cases, but this business of keeping people on death row for 25 and 30 years is pure bulls**t.
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Dec 23, 2006 14:22:12 GMT -6
Neither, as I know almost nothing about the case.
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Jan 3, 2007 16:25:10 GMT -6
Excuse me, but many receive the death penalty for killing prison employees and/or other inmates. They don't have to be released to kill again. Inmates who are given LWOP have nothing, absolutely nothing, to lose when they go on killing while incarcerated. Kenneth McDuff absolutely loved to kill. He was a huge man and could have killed easily with his bare hands. If we're going to lock people up for non-violent crimes or expect individuals to work in our prison systems it is our responsibility to protect them. They are in an environment in which they are completely vulnerable. DR inmates are kept much more secluded and have much less opportunity to kill again. Antis who think of the death penalty as state sanctioned killing need to ask themselves if locking someone up for theft is state sanctioned kidnapping. Individuals and government have different roles. Individuals in a democratic republic hand power over to government. Government makes and enforces our laws. Government not only has the right, but the DUTY, to protect innocent victims......and that includes those who work in our prison system as well as those who are incarcerated. Oslooskar <---- Gives standing applause.
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Jan 3, 2007 0:24:15 GMT -6
Phatkat, I attended Lafayette grammar school in my youth so I know good and well the old boy didn’t live to the ripe old age of 136. Try (1757 – 1834)
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Jan 2, 2007 12:05:52 GMT -6
We should kill to make sure the worst of us don’t. It doesn't work. Really! So you think there’s still a chance that Ted Bundy may kill again?
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Dec 26, 2006 16:42:43 GMT -6
I'm pretty sure that there is only one Joseph Phillps Not only is that completely irrelevant, it’s also untrue. Had you asserted that you were pretty sure that the Joseph Phillips on these forums was the real McCoy (Phillips) then you would have made more sense.
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Dec 26, 2006 14:26:45 GMT -6
What I have or haven't done is a matter of public record. Look it up, Paul. Why don't you come forward with a full, real name and open yourself up for scrutiny, as I do? In all fairness I would caution any nut out there who does not like Joseph Phillips to refrain from making any crank calls to any person by that name. The individual on these forums who uses the name “josephdphillips” may very well be the real Joseph Phillips or he may be someone else who does not like the real Joseph Phillips and wishes to harass him by manipulating others to do it for him
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Dec 26, 2006 3:02:15 GMT -6
We should not kill because the worst of us do. We should kill to make sure the worst of us don’t.
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Dec 22, 2006 13:55:49 GMT -6
The only way it will be abolished entirely is if all the DP states abolish it individually. Not necessarily, there could be a ruling by the USSC on the death penalty that would suddenly end it in every state. Personally, I see that happening within the next 30 years or so.
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Dec 17, 2006 13:46:10 GMT -6
Don't you fret Hotnosh, the death Penalty will prevail. The “death penalty” may be around for a few more years but its days are numbered.
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Dec 26, 2006 12:45:35 GMT -6
So that means that if we have a serial killer who murdered 5 people, and we decide that a little torture before his execution is proportionate to his crime, we can do the same thing with another serial killer? That is a rhetorical question that need not be answered. But is also does not mean the execution has to be painless. As I understand it, it means free of unnecessary pain.
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Dec 21, 2006 3:34:34 GMT -6
OK, so how did this work in the Diaz case? Not all the details are in but it appears that his execution took considerably longer than other executions that were performed by lethal injection. Therefore, I assume that the State of Florida will conduct an investigation and make whatever changes are necessary to insure that all future executions do not come into conflict with the Eighth Amendment I'm guessing a bit here but "wantonly" sounds pretty much like intentional or maybe even reckless Wantonly = without check or restraint; recklessly; waywardly; heartlessly. not having a dictionary right before me www.onelook.com/ Merry Christmas! do you really think Florida intended to have this problem? that it was part of their operational plan? No, I do not.
|
|