|
Post by moonlight on Nov 8, 2017 14:15:13 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by fuglyville on Nov 8, 2017 18:09:27 GMT -6
If there are any doubts about whether he did it and whether the trial was fair, it shouldn't even be a question - of course he should get a new trial, ffs! The fact that the authorities refuses to release evidence is a serious breach of justice, and that alone should be reason to postpone the execution.
If then guilty murderers goes free, it's always better than having one innocent person executed. The US Supreme Court needs to realise that.
|
|
|
Post by whitediamonds on Nov 8, 2017 19:30:49 GMT -6
They did do a DNA test for the original trial. If there was doubt, why did it take so many years to just now bring up a claim he is innocent? To stall.is all. Fug, no one is claiming he is innocent not even him.
He even stated back then he killed her, he was high on cocaine, & how he killed her.
|
|
|
Post by whitediamonds on Nov 8, 2017 21:56:58 GMT -6
As of 9:40 pm, the supreme court has refused to halt the execution.
|
|