|
Post by spinaltap on Apr 17, 2013 12:09:43 GMT -6
Lawyers say Arkansas plans to use untried drug to execute death row inmates
So now they want to try a new drug, and the challenges begin before there is even an execution scheduled.
Lawyers say Arkansas to use untried execution drug APNewsBreak: Lawyers say Arkansas plans to use untried drug to execute death row inmates
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) -- Arkansas plans to put prisoners to death with a drug that apparently hasn't been used in a U.S. execution, and lawyers for condemned inmates warn that it could take longer for someone to die from it than from other lethal injection drugs.
Arkansas Department of Correction spokeswoman Shea Wilson told The Associated Press on Tuesday that the state plans to use phenobarbital, along with lorazepam, in lethal injections. None are currently scheduled, but Arkansas recently passed a law that will allow the state to resume executions.
Both phenobarbital and lorazepam are used to relieve anxiety. Phenobarbital, which is a barbiturate or a kind of depressant drug, is also used to control seizures.
In a letter obtained by the AP, federal public defender Jenniffer Horan told Democratic Gov. Mike Beebe that phenobarbital takes effect more slowly than other drugs used to execute prisoners and that it carries a "substantial risk of a lingering and inhumane death."
"No state has ever used Phenobarbital in a lethal injection procedure, and for good reason," wrote Horan, whose office represents a number of Arkansas death row inmates. "Throughout the history of lethal injection, states have preferred ultra-short-acting barbiturates that cause rapid unconsciousness and death. Phenobarbital, however, has a long onset of action."
Richard Dieter, the executive director of the Washington-based Death Penalty Information Center, also said states have never used phenobarbital in executions.
Arkansas is not alone in seeking different drugs to be used in lethal injections. A manufacturer of propofol, the anesthetic blamed for Michael Jackson's death, said last year that it wouldn't sell the drug for use in U.S. executions, causing a setback for Missouri and other states looking for an alternative after other drug makers also objected to their products' use in lethal injections.
"There is some uncertainty out there even in obtaining some of those drugs so I think states are ... looking into alternatives that might be more readily compounded or available," Dieter said.
Arkansas's last execution was in 2005. The state is seeking to resume executions after legislators this year rewrote a lethal injection law that the state Supreme Court struck down in 2012.
The court ruled that Arkansas legislators had given the Department of Correction too much control over execution procedures. The new law says the state must use a lethal dose of a barbiturate, but it leaves it up to the Department of Correction to determine which drug.
Until Tuesday, corrections officials hadn't said publicly which drug or drugs they plan to use.
A copy of the state's lethal injection procedure, also obtained by the AP on Tuesday, lists phenobarbital and lorazepam as the chemicals to be used.
Wilson, the correction spokeswoman, said phenobarbital was one of the drugs "that the federal public defender listed in a previous lawsuit as an FDA-approved barbiturate."
Horan's office declined to comment beyond the letter to the governor, but in the letter, Horan said phenobarbital has not been approved by the FDA.
No one at the FDA immediately responded to an after-hours phone message seeking comment.
Beebe spokesman Matt DeCample said he hadn't seen Horan's letter, which asks the governor to review the Department of Correction's decision to use phenobarbital.
|
|
|
Post by The Tipsy Broker on Apr 17, 2013 12:50:50 GMT -6
Not trying to start an argument over methods but you guys should have done what we did in Britain (after we did away with beheading etc) and stayed with one method. The gallows and electric chair were both fine. Dressing it up to look like a medical procedure just gives way to more arguments. Which makes me think if this wasn't intended
|
|
|
Post by Potassium_Pixie on Apr 18, 2013 1:31:33 GMT -6
As long as the drug doesn't cause that much pain, I don't see any reason not to use it.
|
|
|
Post by deathcub2000 on Apr 22, 2013 7:24:40 GMT -6
"substantial risk of a lingering and inhumane death."? I thought all death was lingering. And talk about inhumane. I could see problems with condemned men (and women) dying in pain if it wasn't the inhumane way that the murderers killed their victims; Such as hammers(Walkin' Willie Otay, Nebraska), knives, crowbars, drowning and other horrific ways to murder. If the time to die for the prisoner is less than it took his murder victim to die, I say go for it.
|
|
|
Post by deathcub2000 on Apr 22, 2013 7:28:12 GMT -6
Spinaltap, I say push the plunger up to 11.
|
|
|
Post by spinaltap on Apr 22, 2013 8:23:32 GMT -6
Spinaltap, I say push the plunger up to 11. I say test it out. May work better. It's not only 1 louder, it's 1 quicker. For when you need that push over the top.
|
|
|
Post by deathcub2000 on Apr 22, 2013 10:45:57 GMT -6
haha
|
|
|
Post by deathcub2000 on Apr 22, 2013 17:11:52 GMT -6
haha
|
|