|
Post by sclcookie on Jun 12, 2005 17:22:22 GMT -6
Talk about clueless. The reason access to interviews with this murderer was denied is because any such interview wouldn't be relevant to anything. The guy did it. A hat trick of three executions would have been perfect, but life isn't perfect.[/quote] Back in the day, all the people sentenced to death for the same murder were executed consecuativly on the same day. T[/quote] Clueless is for y'all not to figure out why Rich was denied an interview....but I really doubt that is the case....I'm sure y'all have a good understanding on why he was denied an interview, and you're scared about it. Go ahead and make up whatever excuses you want for the injustice in his case....... It's scary that people in the US of A accept his injustice just so y'all can justify an innocent man being executed. Y'all are scared of the truth. Rich is dead. He's not coming back..... It's almost as if y'all are trying to make sure his name isn't cleared? What are you scared of? That I'm right? That if it's "proven" an innocent man was executed that it will be a step to abolish the DP? Welp, it will be proven, and you're intimidations won't stop it.
|
|
|
Post by dio on Jun 12, 2005 17:28:15 GMT -6
It seems odd to me that the issue of clearing his name seems more important to you than saving his life did.I guess if ya fail on 1 you have to try on the other.As a handy man I can offer advice on how to clear his name.......in any hardware store you will find a product called muriatic acid,if you will apply this to his tombstone wait 5 minutes then wash it off with high pressure water his name will shine like a new penny...........advice is free by the way.
|
|
|
Post by Rev. Agave on Jun 12, 2005 17:37:11 GMT -6
Talk about clueless. The reason access to interviews with this murderer was denied is because any such interview wouldn't be relevant to anything. The guy did it. A hat trick of three executions would have been perfect, but life isn't perfect. Back in the day, all the people sentenced to death for the same murder were executed consecuativly on the same day. T[/quote] Clueless is for y'all not to figure out why Rich was denied an interview....but I really doubt that is the case....I'm sure y'all have a good understanding on why he was denied an interview, and you're scared about it. Go ahead and make up whatever excuses you want for the injustice in his case....... It's scary that people in the US of A accept his injustice just so y'all can justify an innocent man being executed. Y'all are scared of the truth. Rich is dead. He's not coming back..... It's almost as if y'all are trying to make sure his name isn't cleared? What are you scared of? That I'm right? That if it's "proven" an innocent man was executed that it will be a step to abolish the DP? Welp, it will be proven, and you're intimidations won't stop it. [/quote] he did apologize for the pain he admittedly caused the victim and his family. I know well enough that antis will not call that statement a confession and that you will argue that he meant something other than what it sounded like, but most people would interpret his apology for the pain that he acknowleges to have caused as an admittance of guilt.
|
|
|
Post by RickZ on Jun 12, 2005 18:55:41 GMT -6
Rich is dead. He's not coming back..... Praise the Lord and pass over a beer! One less scumbucket around. But it sounds like you're just a scum receptacle. How many babies did you have with that piece of sh*t?
|
|
|
Post by josephdphillips on Jun 12, 2005 21:32:05 GMT -6
It's almost as if y'all are trying to make sure his name isn't cleared? What are you scared of? That I'm right? That if it's "proven" an innocent man was executed that it will be a step to abolish the DP? Welp, it will be proven, and you're intimidations won't stop it. Apparently you suffered some form of brain damage at birth. You can't conceive that no one gives a rat's a$$ what a murderer wants to tell the world before his legal and deserved execution. Who besides you, seriously, ever thought of him as anyone other than a murderer? The culpability of this murderer you can no longer fellate was determined at trial, and affirmed on appeal. You can try to clear its (Cartwright's) name all you want. No one cares, least of all in Texas, and no one ever will.
|
|
|
Post by Felix2 on Jun 13, 2005 7:29:12 GMT -6
It's almost as if y'all are trying to make sure his name isn't cleared? What are you scared of? That I'm right? That if it's "proven" an innocent man was executed that it will be a step to abolish the DP? Welp, it will be proven, and you're intimidations won't stop it. Apparently you suffered some form of brain damage at birth. You can't conceive that no one gives a rat's a$$ what a murderer wants to tell the world before his legal and deserved execution. Who besides you, seriously, ever thought of him as anyone other than a murderer? The culpability of this murderer you can no longer fellate was determined at trial, and affirmed on appeal. You can try to clear its (Cartwright's) name all you want. No one cares, least of all in Texas, and no one ever will. People in Texas not caring is not the real issue as Texas is in many ways of no consequence except I predict their use of the DP will probably do more in the long run to achieve it's demise!
|
|
|
Post by josephdphillips on Jun 13, 2005 9:03:28 GMT -6
People in Texas not caring is not the real issue as Texas is in many ways of no consequence except I predict their use of the DP will probably do more in the long run to achieve it's demise! Hope springs eternal.
|
|
|
Post by Felix2 on Jun 13, 2005 9:27:34 GMT -6
People in Texas not caring is not the real issue as Texas is in many ways of no consequence except I predict their use of the DP will probably do more in the long run to achieve it's demise! Hope springs eternal. strange utterance for a no hoper there Joe? As you are a supporter of the stance that holds there is no hope of any redeeming quality in any murderer, I'd have to call that progress, not much mind you, but some is better than none!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 14, 2005 23:48:53 GMT -6
SclCookie, I read through the link you provided in your first post on this thread. I keep hearing that Richard Cartwright was guilty of being involved in the robbery, but not guilty of the act of shooting Mr. Moraida. If that is true then why do I keep seeing the following information about his attorneys argueing his appeal to the Supreme Court?
In the appeal to the Supreme Court, Cartwright's attorneys argued that jurors relied on inaccurate information at the trial. And while not denying Cartwright fired the shots that killed Moraida, 37, the appeal said Cartwright participated in the robbery-slaying under duress because he feared retaliation from Overstreet, who had a reputation for violence. "At most he merely followed orders from a violent person whom he was afraid of and who had already threatened him," the appeal said.
In a round of last-minute appeals, Cartwright's lawyers argued he shot Moraida under pressure from one of his companions and jurors who assessed Cartwright's death sentence were not aware of that duress.
edited for spelling errors
|
|
|
Post by Rev. Agave on Jun 15, 2005 0:21:29 GMT -6
Free Richard Carwright! I hope he gets a stay ;D
|
|
|
Post by DeadElvis on Jun 15, 2005 14:32:12 GMT -6
Slc Cookie, I read throught he link you provided in your first post on this thread. I keep hearing that Richard Cartwright was guilty of being involved in the robbery but not guilty of the act of shooting Mr. Moraida. If that is true then why do I keep seeing the following information about his attorneys argueing his appeal to the Supreme Court? In the appeal to the Supreme Court, Cartwright's attorneys argued that jurors relied on inaccurate information at the trial. And while not denying Cartwright fired the shots that killed Moraida, 37, the appeal said Cartwright participated in the robbery-slaying under duress because he feared retaliation from Overstreet, who had a reputation for violence. "At most he merely followed orders from a violent person whom he was afraid of and who had already threatened him," the appeal said.
In a round of last-minute appeals, Cartwright's lawyers argued he shot Moraida under pressure from one of his companions and jurors who assessed Cartwright's death sentence were not aware of that duress.sssssshhhhhhhh!! didn't you read the post that started this thread. Cartwright was innocent and we all will "never forget his name." Can't let little things like facts get in the way of that.
|
|
|
Post by snowy111 on Jun 15, 2005 17:17:10 GMT -6
Free Richard Carwright! I hope he gets a stay ;D Do you mean he gets to stay in his casket or remain ashes if cremated?
|
|
|
Post by Dea on Jun 15, 2005 18:33:19 GMT -6
Slc Cookie, I read throught he link you provided in your first post on this thread. I keep hearing that Richard Cartwright was guilty of being involved in the robbery but not guilty of the act of shooting Mr. Moraida. If that is true then why do I keep seeing the following information about his attorneys argueing his appeal to the Supreme Court? In the appeal to the Supreme Court, Cartwright's attorneys argued that jurors relied on inaccurate information at the trial. And while not denying Cartwright fired the shots that killed Moraida, 37, the appeal said Cartwright participated in the robbery-slaying under duress because he feared retaliation from Overstreet, who had a reputation for violence. "At most he merely followed orders from a violent person whom he was afraid of and who had already threatened him," the appeal said.
In a round of last-minute appeals, Cartwright's lawyers argued he shot Moraida under pressure from one of his companions and jurors who assessed Cartwright's death sentence were not aware of that duress.sssssshhhhhhhh!! didn't you read the post that started this thread. Cartwright was innocent and we all will "never forget his name." Can't let little things like facts get in the way of that. LOL ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by MrCoffee on Jun 17, 2005 1:12:56 GMT -6
It seems odd to me that the issue of clearing his name seems more important to you than saving his life did.I guess if ya fail on 1 you have to try on the other.As a handy man I can offer advice on how to clear his name.......in any hardware store you will find a product called muriatic acid,if you will apply this to his tombstone wait 5 minutes then wash it off with high pressure water his name will shine like a new penny...........advice is free by the way. Well then, I guess THAT problem is solved. Gosh, and all it takes is a janitor with a pressure washer and his name is as good as new... MrCoffee
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2005 18:23:58 GMT -6
SclCookie, I read through the link you provided in your first post on this thread. I keep hearing that Richard Cartwright was guilty of being involved in the robbery, but not guilty of the act of shooting Mr. Moraida. If that is true then why do I keep seeing the following information about his attorneys argueing his appeal to the Supreme Court? In the appeal to the Supreme Court, Cartwright's attorneys argued that jurors relied on inaccurate information at the trial. And while not denying Cartwright fired the shots that killed Moraida, 37, the appeal said Cartwright participated in the robbery-slaying under duress because he feared retaliation from Overstreet, who had a reputation for violence. "At most he merely followed orders from a violent person whom he was afraid of and who had already threatened him," the appeal said.
In a round of last-minute appeals, Cartwright's lawyers argued he shot Moraida under pressure from one of his companions and jurors who assessed Cartwright's death sentence were not aware of that duress.edited for spelling errors Is there no response to this from Cookie?? "And while not denying Cartwright fired the shots that killed Moraida"
|
|