|
Post by Californian on Jun 26, 2007 22:02:18 GMT -6
Gosh, these new antis have bad memories. This seems pretty much the equivalent of whyspurr forgetting how much she hates this board (posted on CCRAP)
|
|
|
Post by hawkslady on Jun 26, 2007 22:40:56 GMT -6
Gosh, these new antis have bad memories. This seems pretty much the equivalent of whyspurr forgetting how much she hates this board (posted on CCRAP) How many hairs are you going to split before you are satisfied?
|
|
|
Post by Californian on Jun 26, 2007 23:11:52 GMT -6
Gosh, these new antis have bad memories. This seems pretty much the equivalent of whyspurr forgetting how much she hates this board (posted on CCRAP) How many hairs are you going to split before you are satisfied? All of them.
|
|
|
Post by hawkslady on Jun 26, 2007 23:31:23 GMT -6
How many hairs are you going to split before you are satisfied? All of them. enjoy your witch hunt
|
|
|
Post by Lisa on Jun 27, 2007 0:13:26 GMT -6
Gosh, these new antis have bad memories. This seems pretty much the equivalent of whyspurr forgetting how much she hates this board (posted on CCRAP) How many hairs are you going to split before you are satisfied? I'm not splitting hairs here but you did first say that you are a WOWIE and now you're an anti. I guess it's possible that you changed your mind in 3 days. It's also possible that you can't make up your mind. Your explanation didn't explain a thing.
|
|
|
Post by hawkslady on Jun 27, 2007 0:22:33 GMT -6
I am an anti in that I don't believe in the death penalty; I would prefer to do away with it, but as long as we have the death penalty I prefer sentencing on a case by case basis rather than throw every murderer onto death row where some believe they all should be.
If you can't follow that, then maybe it is to simple for you
|
|
|
Post by Lotus Flower on Jun 27, 2007 0:39:08 GMT -6
I am an anti in that I don't believe in the death penalty; I would prefer to do away with it, but as long as we have the death penalty I prefer sentencing on a case by case basis rather than throw every murderer onto death row where some believe they all should be. If you can't follow that, then maybe it is to simple for you She asks it politely, you slam her. Maybe you were being defensive from Cali's post or something, but why the slam at the end to Lisa? The point is valid... wowie is pro, you said that specifically you were pro, now it appears you are splitting hairs by saying you were inferring something other than what you very specifically stated, not the other way around. Right or wrong, we get a lot of penpals and such here pretending they are other ppl and they aren't being honest, so newbies, pro and anti alike are watched for a while before we can really relax around here and roll out the welcome mat. There are MVSs here that we don't want hurt, so yes we are always protective for a bit. Be honest, be consistent, and it'll be no big deal. If you want to slam me too, please respond using 3 letter words or less to keep it simple for me , but I'd rather have a dialogue.
|
|
|
Post by Lisa on Jun 27, 2007 2:21:41 GMT -6
I am an anti in that I don't believe in the death penalty; I would prefer to do away with it, but as long as we have the death penalty I prefer sentencing on a case by case basis rather than throw every murderer onto death row where some believe they all should be. If you can't follow that, then maybe it is to simple for you Here, let me make it simple for YOU, dingbat...if you don't believe in the DP and you would prefer to do away with it you are an anti. That's what they're called on this MB anyway. I hope this helps you overcome your identify crisis.
|
|
|
Post by rosebud on Jun 27, 2007 2:33:26 GMT -6
I am an anti in that I don't believe in the death penalty; I would prefer to do away with it, but as long as we have the death penalty I prefer sentencing on a case by case basis rather than throw every murderer onto death row where some believe they all should be. If you can't follow that, then maybe it is to simple for you follow the door that says EXIT would ya Doesn't get any easier than that
|
|
|
Post by PIP on Jun 27, 2007 5:52:49 GMT -6
I don't dispute what I wrote; I prefer lwop but since we have the death penalty then I have to clarify my belief where that is concerned. I would prefer lwop over the death penalty but that isn't always the case is it. No lies....does that disappoint you? I have a feeling you have no life whatsoever and will spend fruitless hours trying to prove I'm someone you think I am but will find you are wrong. You know, I asked a valid question. You are full of shyt! I can tell when someone is being "wishywashy" with a purpose, so tell me, why are you here? I have a hard time understanding why someone who is an anti would claim at any point that they would make an exception based upon what the system is like. In fact, you are the one that needs to get a life. You are the one pretending to be something you are not. Have fun backpeddling and as Claire stated, don't let the door hit ya where the good lord split ya. I am freakin tired of this crap. If you cannot come here and debate openly and honestly about your views, I am left to wonder who you are postering for. This isn't a witch hunt, it's called being protective of friends and if you cannot understand that, then maybe it's too simple for ya. Dumb a**.
|
|
|
Post by brumsongs on Jun 27, 2007 6:28:39 GMT -6
I don't dispute what I wrote; I prefer lwop but since we have the death penalty then I have to clarify my belief where that is concerned. I would prefer lwop over the death penalty but that isn't always the case is it. No lies....does that disappoint you? I have a feeling you have no life whatsoever and will spend fruitless hours trying to prove I'm someone you think I am but will find you are wrong. You know, I asked a valid question. You are full of shyt! I can tell when someone is being "wishywashy" with a purpose, so tell me, why are you here? I have a hard time understanding why someone who is an anti would claim at any point that they would make an exception based upon what the system is like. In fact, you are the one that needs to get a life. You are the one pretending to be something you are not. Have fun backpeddling and as Claire stated, don't let the door hit ya where the good lord split ya. I am freakin tired of this crap. If you cannot come here and debate openly and honestly about your views, I am left to wonder who you are postering for. This isn't a witch hunt, it's called being protective of friends and if you cannot understand that, then maybe it's too simple for ya. Dumb a**. She answered your question perfectly well- she prefers lwop but the status quo is dp and that being the law at present she favours a case by case approach.
|
|
|
Post by Californian on Jun 27, 2007 7:11:29 GMT -6
enjoy your witch hunt One witch is gone. We're working on you.
|
|
|
Post by hawkslady on Jun 27, 2007 7:54:11 GMT -6
enjoy your witch hunt One witch is gone. We're working on you. I think my hawk is stronger than your owl; we shall see.
|
|
|
Post by Lotus Flower on Jun 27, 2007 9:08:24 GMT -6
You know, I asked a valid question. You are full of shyt! I can tell when someone is being "wishywashy" with a purpose, so tell me, why are you here? I have a hard time understanding why someone who is an anti would claim at any point that they would make an exception based upon what the system is like. In fact, you are the one that needs to get a life. You are the one pretending to be something you are not. Have fun backpeddling and as Claire stated, don't let the door hit ya where the good lord split ya. I am freakin tired of this crap. If you cannot come here and debate openly and honestly about your views, I am left to wonder who you are postering for. This isn't a witch hunt, it's called being protective of friends and if you cannot understand that, then maybe it's too simple for ya. Dumb a**. She answered your question perfectly well- she prefers lwop but the status quo is dp and that being the law at present she favours a case by case approach. Brum, I get ya. But it was clear that the post was meant to read wowie aka pro. Now it appears HL is a firm anti. So the question is okay to ask, which is it? If it's anti consistently then that's anti. If it's case by case, then it's pro. Maybe HL is still new and doesn't feel comfortable defining herself a pro, as she thinks of herself as an anti. When it's put like that, it does lend credence to those who give grief to wowies. It's easier to understand straight-anti or straight-pro.
|
|
|
Post by hawkslady on Jun 27, 2007 9:14:06 GMT -6
If Bland had received LWOP instead of a death sentence Brums, would you consider letting him go home to die, since he's supposedly no longer a threat? If he received LWOP that would be illegal. It is, however, a point noone is addressing that in a couple of decades time LWOP will mean that there are lots of harmless seniors in prison costing the taxpayer a fortune. In California a inmate who is terminal and only has a few months left can petition for home release but those on death row are not eligible for that program so here it is a moot point.
|
|
|
Post by Elric of Melnibone on Jun 27, 2007 9:18:46 GMT -6
It does not matter what disease or condition he was suffering from. He murdered 2 people. His sentence was death. It was carried out. It does not matter if he would have died from cancer next week. His sentence was death and that is that.
|
|
|
Post by hawkslady on Jun 27, 2007 9:23:59 GMT -6
I am an anti in that I don't believe in the death penalty; I would prefer to do away with it, but as long as we have the death penalty I prefer sentencing on a case by case basis rather than throw every murderer onto death row where some believe they all should be. If you can't follow that, then maybe it is to simple for you She asks it politely, you slam her. Maybe you were being defensive from Cali's post or something, but why the slam at the end to Lisa? The point is valid... wowie is pro, you said that specifically you were pro, now it appears you are splitting hairs by saying you were inferring something other than what you very specifically stated, not the other way around. Right or wrong, we get a lot of penpals and such here pretending they are other ppl and they aren't being honest, so newbies, pro and anti alike are watched for a while before we can really relax around here and roll out the welcome mat. There are MVSs here that we don't want hurt, so yes we are always protective for a bit. Be honest, be consistent, and it'll be no big deal. If you want to slam me too, please respond using 3 letter words or less to keep it simple for me , but I'd rather have a dialogue. As most don't trust me, I in turn am not trusting anyone's motives anymore either and will relax when I don't feel threatened. I have a feeling I used wowie out of context and did cause misunderstanding but Brumsongs caught the gist of my meaning. I wish there was no death penalty but as long as there is one, I vote for each case to be taken individually and judged on it's own merits and intents; does that make me a pro with strong anti leanings? I'm sorry for some of you getting confused but think outside the box or make the box bigger.
|
|
|
Post by Elric of Melnibone on Jun 27, 2007 9:32:12 GMT -6
Anti--no exectuions, no matter the crime.
Pro--All murderers should be executed.
Pro--One person should be executed because the crime they did is so evil and vicious.
|
|
|
Post by Lotus Flower on Jun 27, 2007 9:51:20 GMT -6
Anti--no exectuions, no matter the crime. Pro--All murderers should be executed. Pro--One person should be executed because the crime they did is so evil and vicious. What he said. That's the basic categories. It took me months to get wtf wowie meant. HL - I get ya now, sounds like the wowie thing was the stickler. Then, yes, you are a pro, but with anti leanings, not the other way around. At least not in describing your dp view on this board. But in real life, I would switch it if I was telling someone my view. Guess we just like to do stuff backa$$words here, no surprise knowing our little dysfunctional family.
|
|
|
Post by brumsongs on Jun 27, 2007 10:09:39 GMT -6
Anti--no exectuions, no matter the crime. Pro--All murderers should be executed. Pro--One person should be executed because the crime they did is so evil and vicious. What he said. That's the basic categories. It took me months to get wtf wowie meant. HL - I get ya now, sounds like the wowie thing was the stickler. Then, yes, you are a pro, but with anti leanings, not the other way around. At least not in describing your dp view on this board. But in real life, I would switch it if I was telling someone my view. Guess we just like to do stuff backa$$words here, no surprise knowing our little dysfunctional family. I would catagorize her as an anti who prefers the EXISTING Dp to be managed case by case. Just because you have your "hard LWOP" idea for if the the DP is ever abolished , doesn't make you an anti. Likewise hawkslady. Can we all have a group hug now?
|
|
|
Post by Lotus Flower on Jun 27, 2007 10:21:57 GMT -6
What he said. That's the basic categories. It took me months to get wtf wowie meant. HL - I get ya now, sounds like the wowie thing was the stickler. Then, yes, you are a pro, but with anti leanings, not the other way around. At least not in describing your dp view on this board. But in real life, I would switch it if I was telling someone my view. Guess we just like to do stuff backa$$words here, no surprise knowing our little dysfunctional family. I would catagorize her as an anti who prefers the EXISTING Dp to be managed case by case. Just because you have your "hard LWOP" idea for if the the DP is ever abolished , doesn't make you an anti. Likewise hawkslady. Can we all have a group hug now? I'm not hugging you until I get my freaking CD (is it out yet?). I could see that, but I still see an anti as anti-dp, all circumstances. I haven't known an anti yet that's okay with the wowie stance as most antis take umbrage with the disparity of the dp as the crux of their anti argument and arguably so.
|
|
|
Post by brumsongs on Jun 27, 2007 10:29:18 GMT -6
I would catagorize her as an anti who prefers the EXISTING Dp to be managed case by case. Just because you have your "hard LWOP" idea for if the the DP is ever abolished , doesn't make you an anti. Likewise hawkslady. Can we all have a group hug now? I'm not hugging you until I get my freaking CD (is it out yet?). I could see that, but I still see an anti as anti-dp, all circumstances. I haven't known an anti yet that's okay with the wowie stance as most antis take umbrage with the disparity of the dp as the crux of their anti argument and arguably so. As the official guardian of anti morality and etiquette I can confirm that Hawkslady's stance is accepted and she is a member in good standing.
|
|
|
Post by arizonavet on Jun 27, 2007 10:42:51 GMT -6
Can we all have a group hug now? Oh SURE.....go ahead, have a group hug without ArizonaVet... Show that you aren't predjudiced Ben....invite a true, pro-dp wowie to your cyber group hugs.
|
|
|
Post by Lotus Flower on Jun 27, 2007 10:46:02 GMT -6
I'm not hugging you until I get my freaking CD (is it out yet?). I could see that, but I still see an anti as anti-dp, all circumstances. I haven't known an anti yet that's okay with the wowie stance as most antis take umbrage with the disparity of the dp as the crux of their anti argument and arguably so. As the official guardian of anti morality and etiquette I can confirm that Hawkslady's stance is accepted and she is a member in good standing. You're the official guardian of etiquette? This from the man that discussed Claire's um stain on painters I believe it was? I'm scared. I mean it.
|
|
|
Post by rosebud on Jun 27, 2007 11:59:19 GMT -6
As the official guardian of anti morality and etiquette I can confirm that Hawkslady's stance is accepted and she is a member in good standing. You're the official guardian of etiquette? This from the man that discussed Claire's um stain on painters I believe it was? I'm scared. I mean it.
|
|
|
Post by PIP on Jun 27, 2007 16:29:51 GMT -6
eff this
|
|
|
Post by hawkslady on Jun 27, 2007 21:03:44 GMT -6
Brums, you're one heck of a guy, thank you for trying to clarify my intentions.
|
|
|
Post by PIP on Jun 27, 2007 21:18:45 GMT -6
Brums, you're one heck of a guy, thank you for trying to clarify my intentions. What's disgusting is that you cannot clarify them yourself.
|
|
|
Post by hawkslady on Jun 27, 2007 22:18:17 GMT -6
Brums, you're one heck of a guy, thank you for trying to clarify my intentions. What's disgusting is that you cannot clarify them yourself. Somebody wake up on the wrong side of the bed today? I can clarify this; you are a pain in the arse and that is your choice to hang in my arse instead of trying to get to know what's in my head and heart.
|
|
|
Post by Californian on Jun 27, 2007 22:24:00 GMT -6
As the official guardian of anti morality and etiquette I can confirm that Hawkslady's stance is accepted and she is a member in good standing. ...of CCRAP and PTO.
|
|