|
Post by oslooskar on Apr 30, 2018 12:14:05 GMT -6
The fact that I have never met or had a conversation with anyone after they have been declared dead is conclusive evidence.
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Apr 26, 2018 14:15:08 GMT -6
Well, the press is usually about reporting what others say/do, not about stating their own opinions (except OP-EDs), but they do sometimes get things wrong, and often don't do the research they should, and alas, misquote. That's why I try to research. Still, I don't think they are deliberately lying. Now I know why you're called "wonderwoman".
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Apr 26, 2018 14:05:56 GMT -6
Do you have facts to prove that? Yes, I do!
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Apr 25, 2018 23:50:16 GMT -6
The Pope now claims evil criminals do not go to hell. They have no afterlife & just disappear He's right, but that's true for everybody.
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Apr 23, 2018 18:40:25 GMT -6
Does that make you feel safe? No, it makes me feel responsible. When I lived in San Francisco I always had a revolver within easy reach and kept my shooting skills up. However, I now live in a very small, rural, and very affluent community with a crime rate that is next to ZERO. In fact, the last vicious killing here was about eight years ago when a Mountain Lion killed a deer about 200 yards from my front door. So, I don't feel any need to keep a firearm nearby.
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Apr 4, 2018 15:58:20 GMT -6
I'm often asked why are you guys so obsessed with guns? I say, we're not, democrats (and ilk) are obsessed with guns. Good point! My guns are safely stored away in a gun locker and I don't think I've fired one in over 30 years.
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Mar 19, 2018 0:48:59 GMT -6
Forty years of free food, shelter and clothing. And didn't pay a dime in taxes. We're messed up. So let me get this straight; Carlton Gary was on death row for forty years?
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Mar 13, 2018 23:15:38 GMT -6
Thank God his 8 yrs is over. I agree! When Obama signed the NDAA which allows for the indefinite detention of American citizens without charge or trial I knew he was a rat.
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Feb 19, 2018 19:18:08 GMT -6
Absolute perfection is unattainable, which is why it's always better to let 10 guilty murderers go free than to execute one innocent man. so let's let the florida school shooter go free just to be sure. or do you support his execution because he WON'T be innocent? He might actually not be responsible if not innocent. After all, we don’t really know if his actions were in some way affected by all those psychiatric drugs that he was taking.
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Feb 19, 2018 19:12:14 GMT -6
Reread the comment and see if you are still seeing the same thing.
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Feb 13, 2018 18:02:48 GMT -6
If inmates are sentenced to death by old age, there’s no problems with lack of drugs, cruel/unusual punishment, no stressful last-minute appeals, no tie-down team, no execution, no bullets - but the inmate still dies. I’d say that it would be a win-win situation. What say ye? I say the inmate has little to lose if he kills a member of the prison staff.
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Feb 12, 2018 0:41:16 GMT -6
Well, I was just up on Victoria Peak a couple of hours ago and the air up there seemed clean enough but look off in the distance and judge for yourself. Is that mist or smog that I'm pointing to?
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Feb 8, 2018 15:16:07 GMT -6
That's not the point. You claimed the Chinese knew how to get things done. So the question is .....are the Chinese getting things done to the benefit of the Chinese or do the negatives outweigh the positives? Actually that is precisely the point. We are not qualified to ask the question, as we are not Chinese. Well, then, by your own frame of reference you're not qualified to claim the Chinese are getting things done because you're not Chinese.
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Feb 8, 2018 11:49:55 GMT -6
Why would I have your klan hood? I don't know, maybe it's because you have a pointed head.
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Feb 7, 2018 23:23:14 GMT -6
That's better than the draconian regulations we have here. You don't know that because you have yet to breathe the air in either mainland China or Hong Kong. In any case, that's up to the Chinese, not up to us. That's not the point. You claimed the Chinese knew how to get things done. So the question is .....are the Chinese getting things done to the benefit of the Chinese or do the negatives outweigh the positives? Incidentally, I've got an eight hour layover in Hong Kong on Sunday so I'll see of there's been any improvements in air quality since I was last there.
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Feb 6, 2018 15:32:13 GMT -6
Hong Kong is more prosperous than it ever was. The Chinese economy is booming. The Chinese know how to get sh#t done. Yes, but at what cost? I was in Hong Kong and Mainland China in November 2014 and the air pollution was the worst I'd ever seen in my life. Have they cleaned it up since then?
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Feb 6, 2018 0:47:04 GMT -6
I have more than one hat you dolt. I'm sure you do and I strongly suspect the other one is cone shaped and says "Dunce" on it.
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Feb 5, 2018 17:10:48 GMT -6
That was before it chewed up my Stetson. Oh come now, Bernardo! Since when is a Beanie hat with a propeller a Stetson?
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Jan 31, 2018 15:49:19 GMT -6
I don't understand how he was out on parole after 8 years for killing his first wife. There was a guy in California who picked up a fifteen year old hitchhiker and cut both of her arms off after raping her. The victim survived and testified against her attacker who was then convicted of the crime and given a sentence of only 14 years in prison of which he served just eight years. Unfortunately, a few years after the monster's release from prison he murdered a mother of three in Florida.
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Jan 26, 2018 22:31:58 GMT -6
You don't want solutions. You are simply here to argue, and you don't even do a good job of it. The problem with bernard is he insists on continuing the same game of Chess after he's been checkmated.
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Jan 11, 2018 16:48:33 GMT -6
you will have 20 virgins waiting for you. NO THANKS! If they're still virgins in the afterlife that means they were too homely in this life and nobody wanted a roll in the hay with them.
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Jan 11, 2018 13:30:56 GMT -6
Don't be ridiculous. I've used my name for 13 years without consequence. Most ocean liners sail the seas of this world without consequences but a man would still have to be a fool to book passage on one if he knew it didn't have any lifeboats. Are the arguments truly yours? How is anyone to know? Totally irrelevant! You challenge the argument being presented, not the individual presenting it. You're a nobody. An Internet Protocol address -- untraceable, unaccountable, meaningless. And your point is exactly what?
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Jan 10, 2018 22:02:01 GMT -6
Why, because I stand for something? No, because you put yourself and your family at risk by revealing your name. How can I take you seriously when you refuse to identify yourself. By simply weighing the merits of my arguments-------which would tell you far more about me than my name. After all, "What's in a name?"
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Jan 10, 2018 12:28:15 GMT -6
He masked his identity. I did not, and never have. That's one of the reasons why I've always doubted your sanity.
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Jan 7, 2018 23:07:58 GMT -6
yup, when it gets revisited by SCOTUS. you and I can call it "unconstitutional" till the cows come home buuut until another SCOTUS calls it such, it remains as is. So since you and I don't get to vote on rulings, it remains important that we do vote for people (hope) will appoint good justices. No? Like most Strawman arguments nobody is going to dispute that! The problem for you is that in your initial statement you made no such clarification. So what you're doing right now is simply backtracking. And I must confess, I find it most amusing.
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Jan 6, 2018 22:30:31 GMT -6
I said their interpretations were final until revisited by SCOTUS again. No, you said, "calling their rulings unconstitutional seems out of place by anyone but fellow SCOTUS members."
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Jan 6, 2018 17:30:14 GMT -6
well since the entire reason SCOTUS exists is "interpretation", calling their rulings unconstitutional seems out of place by anyone but fellow SCOTUS members. If one believes that then he would have to be dumb enough to believe that SCOTUS members are more capable of interpreting the English language than each and every single one of us.
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Dec 19, 2017 15:05:48 GMT -6
does the death penalty prevent crime in the u.s First of all, death isn't a penalty. A penalty is something that has to be experienced. However, that having been said, YES, executions prevent the executed from engaging in future criminal acts.
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Nov 22, 2017 17:21:55 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by oslooskar on Nov 18, 2017 16:07:49 GMT -6
>>> On the contrary, we have an Eighth Amendment in this great nation of ours and if you can't respect it then go live in some other country. Your quote, not mine! Yes, those are indeed my words! And I seriously doubt that any levelheaded individual would interpret them as a demand for your exile from the United States. In fact, most people would simply interpret such words, for what the are, as a simple suggestion that you might be happier elsewhere if you're frustrated by the Eighth Amendment. Seriously, stop grasping at straws; it makes you look ridiculous.
|
|