|
Post by bernard on Mar 26, 2015 21:57:30 GMT -6
They're vicious little b@stards, and it's the only 100% way to guarantee they won't get out and kill or mutilate some kid.
|
|
|
Post by whitediamonds on Mar 27, 2015 11:46:26 GMT -6
They're vicious little b@stards, and it's the only 100% way to guarantee they won't get out and kill or mutilate some kid. Set them free they are innocent !!!
|
|
|
Post by bernard on Mar 27, 2015 12:34:33 GMT -6
They're vicious little b@stards, and it's the only 100% way to guarantee they won't get out and kill or mutilate some kid. Set them free they are innocent !!! Maybe there is a middle way.
|
|
|
Post by whitediamonds on Mar 27, 2015 17:20:10 GMT -6
Set them free they are innocent !!! Maybe there is a middle way. Maybe, until they start killing others again while contained, or by escape. It would be cruel/ senseless/ barbaric, to keep them contained to natural death for those who are hardwired with killer instinct.
|
|
|
Post by bernard on Mar 27, 2015 19:45:35 GMT -6
Maybe there is a middle way. Maybe, until they start killing others again while contained, or by escape. It would be cruel/ senseless/ barbaric, to keep them contained to natural death for those who are hardwired with killer instinct. They all have a killer instinct. They're baboons.
|
|
|
Post by whitediamonds on Mar 27, 2015 20:54:01 GMT -6
Maybe, until they start killing others again while contained, or by escape. It would be cruel/ senseless/ barbaric, to keep them contained to natural death for those who are hardwired with killer instinct. They all have a killer instinct. They're baboons. Their killer instinct kicks in to protect their young etc. Normally not to just kill for the hell of it. Not like they premeditate looking for victims.
|
|
|
Post by Californian on Mar 27, 2015 22:04:24 GMT -6
Maybe, until they start killing others again while contained, or by escape. It would be cruel/ senseless/ barbaric, to keep them contained to natural death for those who are hardwired with killer instinct. Round them up and ship them to Detroit. They'll be solid citizens (and vote Democratic) in no time.
|
|
|
Post by bernard on Mar 28, 2015 2:54:02 GMT -6
They all have a killer instinct. They're baboons. Their killer instinct kicks in to protect their young etc. Normally not to just kill for the hell of it. Their killer instinct kicks in for an opportunity to rape the member's of another male's harem, to slaughter the infants of rival baboons, for a variety of reasons really. One father in the first clip uses an infant as a living shield in the hope of inspiring his harem to attack a gang of males. Enjoy.
|
|
|
Post by whitediamonds on Mar 28, 2015 9:19:12 GMT -6
Their killer instinct kicks in to protect their young etc. Normally not to just kill for the hell of it. Their killer instinct kicks in for an opportunity to rape the member's of another male's harem, to slaughter the infants of rival baboons, for a variety of reasons really. One father in the first clip uses an infant as a living shield in the hope of inspiring his harem to attack a gang of males. Enjoy. Sounds like what some humans do to their own & others doesn't it.
|
|
|
Post by whitediamonds on Mar 28, 2015 9:21:07 GMT -6
Maybe, until they start killing others again while contained, or by escape. It would be cruel/ senseless/ barbaric, to keep them contained to natural death for those who are hardwired with killer instinct. Round them up and ship them to Detroit. They'll be solid citizens (and vote Democratic) in no time. Detroit would work.
|
|
|
Post by bernard on Mar 29, 2015 1:53:40 GMT -6
Their killer instinct kicks in for an opportunity to rape the member's of another male's harem, to slaughter the infants of rival baboons, for a variety of reasons really. One father in the first clip uses an infant as a living shield in the hope of inspiring his harem to attack a gang of males. Enjoy. Sounds like what some humans do to their own & others doesn't it. Exactly. So do you agree we should kill all the baboons at the zoo? It's the only way to be 100% sure they won't kill or mutilate a park worker, or escape and kill a person. Unless you are one of these fools who thinks that baboons can be rehabilitated, you must agree that we have no other choice.
|
|
|
Post by whitediamonds on Mar 29, 2015 7:59:55 GMT -6
Sounds like what some humans do to their own & others doesn't it. Exactly. So do you agree we should kill all the baboons at the zoo? It's the only way to be 100% sure they won't kill or mutilate a park worker, or escape and kill a person. Unless you are one of these fools who thinks that baboons can be rehabilitated, you must agree that we have no other choice. First the baboon did not kill a human we know of if brought to a zoo, we have them chained for transport knowing their potential. If a baboon can live with the other baboons at the zoo we keep them for what reasons? Playing with fire you may lose, which does happen even at zoo's. Zookeepers do their job are at high risk, so is the public if something goes amiss.
|
|
|
Post by whitediamonds on Mar 29, 2015 9:19:30 GMT -6
Exactly. So do you agree we should kill all the baboons at the zoo? It's the only way to be 100% sure they won't kill or mutilate a park worker, or escape and kill a person. Unless you are one of these fools who thinks that baboons can be rehabilitated, you must agree that we have no other choice. We put baboons in a zoo, knowing they will kill if opportunity. If a" baboon starts killing off the other baboons around them while in captivity we euthanize them. If a baboon attacks a human, we do not catch that baboon & place him in a zoo to begin with. Sane thing to do is kill the baboon. Nor do we care what gender the baboon is. I am not one of those fools who believes we can rehabilitate a natural killer, be it a beast or a human beast with kller instinct. Nor do I believe in everyone deserves a second chance when it comes to murder. Victims are dead no matter what but, there is a big difference in one who shoots someone & kills them vs one who hunts others down for the soul purpose of heinously murdering anyone in their path for satisfaction, no remorse, for the game of it like a preying beast would..
|
|
|
Post by bernard on Mar 29, 2015 13:19:17 GMT -6
Exactly. So do you agree we should kill all the baboons at the zoo? It's the only way to be 100% sure they won't kill or mutilate a park worker, or escape and kill a person. Unless you are one of these fools who thinks that baboons can be rehabilitated, you must agree that we have no other choice. First the baboon did not kill a human we know of if brought to a zoo, we have them chained for transport knowing their potential. If a baboon can live with the other baboons at the zoo we keep them for what reasons? Playing with fire you may lose, which does happen even at zoo's. Zookeepers do their job are at high risk, so is the public if something goes amiss. I'm just not sure I understand your opinion. You say "playing with fire you may lose". I agree. So doesn't that mean killing the baboons? Otherwise, by keeping them at the zoo, we are playing with fire. And by setting them free, we are DEFINITELY playing with fire.
|
|
|
Post by bernard on Mar 29, 2015 13:21:18 GMT -6
Victims are dead no matter what but, there is a big difference in one who shoots someone & kills them vs one who hunts others down for the soul purpose of heinously murdering anyone in their path for satisfaction, no remorse, for the game of it like a preying beast would.. You're saying that "preying beasts" are worse?
|
|
|
Post by whitediamonds on Mar 29, 2015 14:20:10 GMT -6
You're saying that "preying beasts" are worse? Yep.
|
|
|
Post by whitediamonds on Mar 29, 2015 14:24:32 GMT -6
First the baboon did not kill a human we know of if brought to a zoo, we have them chained for transport knowing their potential. If a baboon can live with the other baboons at the zoo we keep them for what reasons? Playing with fire you may lose, which does happen even at zoo's. Zookeepers do their job are at high risk, so is the public if something goes amiss. I'm just not sure I understand your opinion. You say "playing with fire you may lose". I agree. So doesn't that mean killing the baboons? Otherwise, by keeping them at the zoo, we are playing with fire. And by setting them free, we are DEFINITELY playing with fire. I have never had any baboons running thru any area I lived in. Only human killers preying on their own breed.
|
|
|
Post by whitediamonds on Mar 29, 2015 14:26:15 GMT -6
I'm just not sure I understand your opinion. You say "playing with fire you may lose". I agree. So doesn't that mean killing the baboons? Otherwise, by keeping them at the zoo, we are playing with fire. And by setting them free, we are DEFINITELY playing with fire. Why do we bring them here & keep them at a Zoo? I have never had any baboons running thru any area I lived in. Only human killers preying on their own breed.
|
|
|
Post by bernard on Mar 29, 2015 16:01:46 GMT -6
You're saying that "preying beasts" are worse? Yep. So what you're saying is that preying beasts like baboons are worse than "one who shoots someone & kills them"?
|
|
|
Post by bernard on Mar 29, 2015 16:10:02 GMT -6
I'm just not sure I understand your opinion. You say "playing with fire you may lose". I agree. So doesn't that mean killing the baboons? Otherwise, by keeping them at the zoo, we are playing with fire. And by setting them free, we are DEFINITELY playing with fire. I have never had any baboons running thru any area I lived in. Only human killers preying on their own breed. Well, baboons are probably not native to the areas you live in. If you think we should release the ones in the zoo, however, then they will be. Unless you want to release them back in the countries from which they are native, and make it someone else's problem.
|
|
|
Post by whitediamonds on Mar 29, 2015 17:21:36 GMT -6
Unless you want to release them back in the countries from which they are native, and make it someone else's problem. If we release them back to the countries the baboons came from to begin with, how in the heck are we making it someone else's problem? Those countries can shoot & kill them all off if they want to, it is their baboons. We have enough of our own human beast with killer instincts.
|
|
|
Post by bernard on Mar 29, 2015 19:55:58 GMT -6
If we release them back to the countries the baboons came from to begin with, how in the heck are we making it someone else's problem? Those countries can shoot & kill them all off if they want to, it is their baboons. We have enough of our own human beast with killer instincts. If we release them into the wild then, between now and the time the last one is shot, children could be killed in their beds by marauding baboons. You are not offering a 100% solution. But if we kill the baboon while it is still in the zoo, it will never kill anyone. 100% FACT.
|
|
|
Post by whitediamonds on Mar 29, 2015 20:07:35 GMT -6
If we release them into the wild then, between now and the time the last one is shot, children could be killed in their beds by marauding baboons. You are not offering a 100% solution. But if we kill the baboon while it is still in the zoo, it will never kill anyone. 100% FACT. Sure, you can go to the Zoo & kill off all the dangerous killer instinct critters, we took from their natural habitat. Then consider them to be the threat.Better than keeping them caged for life.
|
|
|
Post by bernard on Mar 30, 2015 0:36:29 GMT -6
If we release them into the wild then, between now and the time the last one is shot, children could be killed in their beds by marauding baboons. You are not offering a 100% solution. But if we kill the baboon while it is still in the zoo, it will never kill anyone. 100% FACT. Sure, you can go to the Zoo & kill off all the dangerous killer instinct critters, we took from their natural habitat. Then consider them to be the threat.Better than keeping them caged for life. No, it is better to keep them caged for life than to let them run free. You can't take chances with killers, and you already said that preying beasts are worse than people who shoot other people.
|
|
|
Post by whitediamonds on Mar 30, 2015 8:59:44 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by whitediamonds on Mar 30, 2015 9:08:13 GMT -6
You believe they love you, like you love them. That is the best lesson to to learn about these guys . They do not have the same feelings that we do.
And they won't think twice if they come to kill you.
Beast or human beast.
|
|
|
Post by whitediamonds on Mar 30, 2015 9:32:01 GMT -6
Sure, you can go to the Zoo & kill off all the dangerous killer instinct critters, we took from their natural habitat. Then consider them to be the threat.Better than keeping them caged for life. You can't take chances with killers, Agree.
|
|
|
Post by bernard on Apr 1, 2015 9:22:12 GMT -6
You can't take chances with killers, Agree. So you are in favor of killing all the baboons. I'm amused to hear it.
|
|
|
Post by whitediamonds on Apr 1, 2015 12:53:27 GMT -6
So you are in favor of killing all the baboons. I'm amused to hear it. I never stated I would kill "all" the baboons, I told you if you want to go for it. I am for kiling a baboon if they kill another baboon in captivity, or a human. I also stated I am not in favor of keeping them in a zoo, or captivity here. I know I would not want to live near a zoo.
|
|
|
Post by bernard on Apr 1, 2015 15:01:05 GMT -6
So you are in favor of killing all the baboons. I'm amused to hear it. I never stated I would kill "all" the baboons, I told you if you want to go for it. I am for kiling a baboon if they kill another baboon in captivity, or a human. Then you are taking a chance with the lives of the workers at the zoo, the visitors, people who live nearby, and other animals at the zoo. I shudder to think what would happen to the beavers if the baboons broke into their area. It seems that you do not care. Yes, I know. You are in favor of letting killers run wild, so long as it isn't near you.
|
|